Im a sports fan, a huge on in fact. However in the wide world of sports there is no room to be a fanatic of any sort. Alex Rodriguez is a man, Adam Jones is a man,
Lebron James is a man. Professional athletes are mortal and are no different from your local shade tree mechanic in genetic make up. In America we tend to put the objects of our sports idolization on an unrealistic plateau. While they are on the field,
that's one thing, they are expected to be great,
after all they are being paid millions of dollars to be just that. On the
other hand when these people are of their respective fields of play we need not scrutinize their personal lives as much as we do.
In the past couple of years sports personality have been the subject of much public ridicule. Wrong or Right isn't what
I'm interested, what I am interested in is a spotlight that is being shone too brightly on men that are expected to be gods. Michael Vick is in the midst of a two year prison sentence for fighting dogs. Really, fighting dogs. First and foremost, it has already been established that Vick himself never fought a dog. He did however fund a dog fighting franchise.
OK, that was wrong without a doubt, but
I'm not interested in the right or wrong of the matter. Vick was sentenced to 23 months in a federal prison for his involvement. Personally I think that such a sentence was without warrant and excessive to say the least. However, because of Vick's celebrity it seems as though he may have been unfairly targeted and paid the price of fame. With a little more than a month remaining in home confinement,
Michael is at a crossroads. Had Vick been an ordinary citizen he would have been given a second chance. Hopefully the public as well as the NFL is willing to give Vick a second chance.
Adam '
Pacman' Jones. In the NFL
Pacman is seen as a nuisance and a
problemed individual, but in the grand scheme of things he's just another man.
Pacman developed a criminal record by doing what most twenty-something year old men do. Party, drink and hang out with friends. If everyone was placed under the same microscope as
Pacman and disciplined the same, there would be a surplus of arrests in this country. Why oh why has
Pacman been so wronged. When you are in a position of fame, there are people that will love you, people that will hate you and people that can care less of you
existence. In Adam's case there was a large number of people that hated him and hated on him. Unfortunately, he put himself in a position to be around those folks. Sometimes defending
yourself can appear as
aggression, how is that even possible? When
you're a celebrity any misstep
ai preceived as
cataclysmic.
Now on to the most recent source of personal outrage.
Cleveland Browns wide receiver
Donte Stallworth has just been suspended indefinitely by the
commissioner of the NFL Roger
Goddell. The suspension comes on the heels of
Stallworth pleading guilty to vehicular manslaughter.
Stallworth was admittedly intoxicated at the time of the accident. His poor decision choosing to drive while drunk resulted in the unfortunate loss of life for Mr. Reyes. Its says
alot about a person's character when they make a mistake and own up to it opposed to making excuses for their actions.
Stallworth accepted a plea deal that amounts to about 27 days in jail, 2 years of house arrest, 8 years probation, 1000 hours of community service, and a lifetime revocation of his license, as well as a financial settlement with the victim's family. Most would say he got off pretty easily as far as the jail term is concerned. Agreed, the sentence was a bit light considering the loss of life. However, the district attorney saw it to be a
reasonable sentence considering all of the other stipulations.
I'm not a paralegal nor am I an attorney of any sort, with that being said I am completely satisfied with the sentence as I believe that the law was carried out to an extent and justice was seemingly served. The problem arises when word comes down from the NFL that
Donte has been suspended indefinitely. This man has to live with the fact that he is responsible for the death of another human being for the rest of his life, now you want to take away the man's livelihood and ability to make a living. Maybe my vexation is a bit premature seeing as how he has only been indefinitely suspended for a period of time that has yet to be determined, but I can't help but feel a bit iffy about the entire situation. Mr.
Stallworth has a burden that he must bear for the rest of his days and I believe that there is no need to take away his ability to make a living.